Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tim's avatar

Wow. Absolutely fascinating.

Are there any experts researching autism at Westwood University? I read this one twice, and I think there is some crossover between the performance stress of females with inadequate partners, compared to the performance that autistic individuals feel they need to maintain to keep the facade that they are neurotypical. Not sure about the clinical/scientific literature, but the more casual term is “masking.”

I’ve mentioned I have autism, and among the “accommodations” that help me to function in the neurotypical world have involved my quality of sleep.

1. Weighted blanket

2. Memory foam mattress. Later replaced with a memory foam mattress with “cooling” technology.

3. The right sheets and pajamas.

4. BiPAP machine

5. Eye mask

But the thing that hits the hardest is, I’m still living with my mother, and I can kind of see this sleep disruption pattern in her. I’m pretty sure it’s a response, not to sexual inadequacy, but a deeper psychological trauma, that at some level she feels she needs to mask, like an autistic individual.

I suspect my upcoming intake at Westwood is now going to revolve around my need for a directive female to replace my mother, as my mother seems to have a need to perform due to my inadequacy to properly modulate my vocal tone to properly soothe her childhood trauma.

Maybe I’ll need to bring my mother to the intake or the first follow-up. I better call and ask about that. Excuse me…

Allerlei's avatar

Another fascinating study that clearly and scientifically identifies a, or one could say THE, major cause of female insomnia — the culprit is the anatomical, temporal, or psychological inadequacy of the male partner. And the solution is implementation of the pussy-free protocol. The study further suggests that the type of inadequacy is irrelevant — all three types of inadequacy result in the exact same outcome, female insomnia. Yet, the Key Findings of the study seem to focus on anatomical inadequacy, as only size is listed in parentheses when defining inadequate males. This may be an oversight, but it may lead to failure of male readers afflicted with temporal or psychological inadequacy but only reading the Key Findings, to submit to/being put on the pussy-free protocol.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?