Im a Position 4 beta male, dimensionally adequate but without stamina and psychologically inadequate. I have been orally oriented to worship the divine vagina for many years. My wife must have recognized this because, even though I am a high value male (other than my penis) she never once in 37 years gave me a bowjob to completion. I still love to put the head in, and was permitted to do so after her orgasms. I wouldnt do it otherwise;wiithout having worshiped the vagina, penile entry is a selfish lie. My new woman has told me she is an experienced cocksucker in her prior marriage and did mot receive oral sex, but now with me she has orgasms from oral and no lomger sucks my cock. We both acknowledge that giving me oral is unnecessary, and degrading to her.
Ik vind dit onderzoek erg oppervlakkig en het weerspiegelt niet alles wat er daadwerkelijk met mannen of vrouwen gebeurt. Uit mijn observaties blijkt dat een groot aantal mannen op verschillende manieren kan worden gecategoriseerd. Overigens kan ik mezelf ook niet indelen in slechts één van de vier beschreven typen. Bovendien is het onmogelijk om alles te beperken en te stabiliseren; het leven is onstabiel en gevarieerd, en brengt altijd onverwachte uitdagingen en nieuwe wendingen met zich mee. Het enige dat als voorwaardelijke stabiliteit kan worden beschouwd, is een consistente diversiteit aan externe en verborgen kenmerken en de potentiële gevolgen van gedrags- en denkpatronen. Het is overigens ook mogelijk om oorzaak-gevolgrelaties te formuleren die aan deze kenmerken voorafgaan en bepaalde strategieën te ontwikkelen om ze te elimineren.
I'm sorry you felt this way. Though I must admit I'm puzzled by your comment. I'm not a researcher, I'm an erotica writer. So when you say "this research is very superficial", I assume you mean my interpretation of the underlying science?
I ask because the science I cite in my writing is real, but my interpretation is, of course, fictional. As is the data collected by Westwood (which is also fictional).
And I suppose as measured against real science, all of my writing is superficial. Another way to put it is that all of the views expressed here are my own and reflect my impression of responsive male psychology. I don't claim to have the market cornered on wisdom, nor do I claim that my fictional interpretations are scientifically robust or complete or represent the only possible interpretation. I suppose what I'm getting at is this: it doesn't surprise me that you can't classify yourself into just one of the four described types. Nor do I disagree that it is possible to limit or stabilize everything. To suggest otherwise would be to reduce all human sexuality to stereotypes, and that would be neither kind nor reasonable nor fair. Humans are complex. Men are complex.
I call my writing fiction (see: https://penelopefrothe.substack.com/about) expressly because it is and because I recognize and accept that nobody — no matter their history — can be neatly placed in a category or box. Life is messy. Sex is messy.
So please do offer your views. I welcome them. I love feedback. I welcome debate. But please do not take any of this too seriously. Everything you read here is just my fictional interpretation of real science as I imagine it applied to the responsive male.
My feelings won't be hurt if you disagree with me. But I would be distressed to learn that you were relying on me to make sense of your sexuality. Because, as I say, I'm not a doctor. Or a therapist. I write fiction. Everything on this Substack is fictional. You should no more rely on my writing for your sexual understanding than you would rely on Andy Weir to tell you how to safely survive on Mars.
And while I am gratified that some readers find my fiction helpful, my work will always remain just that: fiction.
And I apologize, no, I won't argue, I really like your sophistication. I completely agree with what you write; I took everything at face value. I'm an idiot myself; I should have realized there's room for interpretation everywhere. It's so realistic. It's just that in life, everything is simpler, rougher, with humiliation, coercion, and violence... It's not that violence or coercion are unacceptable to me; this is exactly where my understanding of female superiority began, and it was the very thing I could hide behind from unbearable shame. And yes, at first, and at school, I really couldn't handle certain girls, with whom it all started, and then, of course, I just pretended I couldn't handle them, for various reasons. Yes, I play roles. I'm just afraid of somehow frightening the self-confidence of those women who are interested in me as a victim for their own interests and generally undermining their self-confidence as dominant women. It's probably not good, but I'm interested in it, and I explore it for myself and for them too. For me, too, by the way, many interpretations are so closely intertwined that I myself have difficulty separating what I experienced in reality, what in a dream, and what from what I imagined, or could have imagined. I get confused about the chronology of events, although in fact I experienced it all, even if something wasn't quite as I thought.
No need to apologize at all sweetheart. I meant what I said. I welcome feedback. I'm so glad when readers share their lived experiences. It helps me understand them (you) and makes my writing that much better. It is all uncharted territory for me — writing about responsive males and their penises. I'm learning as I go. So please share and push back when I get it wrong. That's welcome. Sincerely. 😊
Years ago, I read about a study that found that the largest market share for female prostitutes was married men who went for a blow job, because their wives refused to do it.
Im a Position 4 beta male, dimensionally adequate but without stamina and psychologically inadequate. I have been orally oriented to worship the divine vagina for many years. My wife must have recognized this because, even though I am a high value male (other than my penis) she never once in 37 years gave me a bowjob to completion. I still love to put the head in, and was permitted to do so after her orgasms. I wouldnt do it otherwise;wiithout having worshiped the vagina, penile entry is a selfish lie. My new woman has told me she is an experienced cocksucker in her prior marriage and did mot receive oral sex, but now with me she has orgasms from oral and no lomger sucks my cock. We both acknowledge that giving me oral is unnecessary, and degrading to her.
lol...it sounds like she's a keeper 🤔😘😂
Ik vind dit onderzoek erg oppervlakkig en het weerspiegelt niet alles wat er daadwerkelijk met mannen of vrouwen gebeurt. Uit mijn observaties blijkt dat een groot aantal mannen op verschillende manieren kan worden gecategoriseerd. Overigens kan ik mezelf ook niet indelen in slechts één van de vier beschreven typen. Bovendien is het onmogelijk om alles te beperken en te stabiliseren; het leven is onstabiel en gevarieerd, en brengt altijd onverwachte uitdagingen en nieuwe wendingen met zich mee. Het enige dat als voorwaardelijke stabiliteit kan worden beschouwd, is een consistente diversiteit aan externe en verborgen kenmerken en de potentiële gevolgen van gedrags- en denkpatronen. Het is overigens ook mogelijk om oorzaak-gevolgrelaties te formuleren die aan deze kenmerken voorafgaan en bepaalde strategieën te ontwikkelen om ze te elimineren.
I'm sorry you felt this way. Though I must admit I'm puzzled by your comment. I'm not a researcher, I'm an erotica writer. So when you say "this research is very superficial", I assume you mean my interpretation of the underlying science?
I ask because the science I cite in my writing is real, but my interpretation is, of course, fictional. As is the data collected by Westwood (which is also fictional).
And I suppose as measured against real science, all of my writing is superficial. Another way to put it is that all of the views expressed here are my own and reflect my impression of responsive male psychology. I don't claim to have the market cornered on wisdom, nor do I claim that my fictional interpretations are scientifically robust or complete or represent the only possible interpretation. I suppose what I'm getting at is this: it doesn't surprise me that you can't classify yourself into just one of the four described types. Nor do I disagree that it is possible to limit or stabilize everything. To suggest otherwise would be to reduce all human sexuality to stereotypes, and that would be neither kind nor reasonable nor fair. Humans are complex. Men are complex.
I call my writing fiction (see: https://penelopefrothe.substack.com/about) expressly because it is and because I recognize and accept that nobody — no matter their history — can be neatly placed in a category or box. Life is messy. Sex is messy.
So please do offer your views. I welcome them. I love feedback. I welcome debate. But please do not take any of this too seriously. Everything you read here is just my fictional interpretation of real science as I imagine it applied to the responsive male.
My feelings won't be hurt if you disagree with me. But I would be distressed to learn that you were relying on me to make sense of your sexuality. Because, as I say, I'm not a doctor. Or a therapist. I write fiction. Everything on this Substack is fictional. You should no more rely on my writing for your sexual understanding than you would rely on Andy Weir to tell you how to safely survive on Mars.
And while I am gratified that some readers find my fiction helpful, my work will always remain just that: fiction.
And I apologize, no, I won't argue, I really like your sophistication. I completely agree with what you write; I took everything at face value. I'm an idiot myself; I should have realized there's room for interpretation everywhere. It's so realistic. It's just that in life, everything is simpler, rougher, with humiliation, coercion, and violence... It's not that violence or coercion are unacceptable to me; this is exactly where my understanding of female superiority began, and it was the very thing I could hide behind from unbearable shame. And yes, at first, and at school, I really couldn't handle certain girls, with whom it all started, and then, of course, I just pretended I couldn't handle them, for various reasons. Yes, I play roles. I'm just afraid of somehow frightening the self-confidence of those women who are interested in me as a victim for their own interests and generally undermining their self-confidence as dominant women. It's probably not good, but I'm interested in it, and I explore it for myself and for them too. For me, too, by the way, many interpretations are so closely intertwined that I myself have difficulty separating what I experienced in reality, what in a dream, and what from what I imagined, or could have imagined. I get confused about the chronology of events, although in fact I experienced it all, even if something wasn't quite as I thought.
No need to apologize at all sweetheart. I meant what I said. I welcome feedback. I'm so glad when readers share their lived experiences. It helps me understand them (you) and makes my writing that much better. It is all uncharted territory for me — writing about responsive males and their penises. I'm learning as I go. So please share and push back when I get it wrong. That's welcome. Sincerely. 😊
I can relate to this paper as a true responsive male. Never related to the increasing use of cunnilingus to the lack of fellatio.
Years ago, I read about a study that found that the largest market share for female prostitutes was married men who went for a blow job, because their wives refused to do it.
that's so interesting. Exactly the kind of paper I will now have to track down 🤔😂😍
It’s the male lover’s secret weapon
it really really is 😊😍